2024
Abdullah, Reza; Xavier, Blessy David; Namgung, Hyewon; Varghese, Varun; Fujiwara, Akimasa
Managing transit-oriented development: A comparative analysis of expert groups and multi-criteria decision making methods Journal Article
In: Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 115, pp. 105871, 2024, ISSN: 2210-6707.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Fuzzy AHP, Jakarta, MRT, Multi-criteria decision making, Sensitivity coefficient, Transit-oriented development
@article{ABDULLAH2024105871,
title = {Managing transit-oriented development: A comparative analysis of expert groups and multi-criteria decision making methods},
author = {Reza Abdullah and Blessy David Xavier and Hyewon Namgung and Varun Varghese and Akimasa Fujiwara},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670724006954},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105871},
issn = {2210-6707},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-01-01},
journal = {Sustainable Cities and Society},
volume = {115},
pages = {105871},
abstract = {A key challenge for transport managers and planners in sustainable development is evaluating transit facilities' performance. While Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) tools are often used, they can be influenced by experts' subjective biases. This study applies MCDM to assess Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) stations in Jakarta, Indonesia, focusing on Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). The primary goal is to compare stakeholder perspectives and MCDM methods, complemented by a sensitivity analysis and validation with real-world smart card data. The findings reveal significant differences in criteria weighting between Indonesian and non-Indonesian experts, and between academic and non-academic experts, especially in transit connectivity and land use diversity. The study also shows variations in station rankings across different MCDM methods. Sensitivity analysis identifies transit connectivity as the most critical criterion. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) with linear normalisation aligns well with actual usage data and shows robustness in sensitivity analysis, making it the most reliable method for TOD evaluation. The study highlights the need for continuous TOD performance monitoring and the regular collection of real-world data on ridership and TOD indicators.},
keywords = {Fuzzy AHP, Jakarta, MRT, Multi-criteria decision making, Sensitivity coefficient, Transit-oriented development},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
A key challenge for transport managers and planners in sustainable development is evaluating transit facilities' performance. While Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) tools are often used, they can be influenced by experts' subjective biases. This study applies MCDM to assess Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) stations in Jakarta, Indonesia, focusing on Transit-Oriented Development (TOD). The primary goal is to compare stakeholder perspectives and MCDM methods, complemented by a sensitivity analysis and validation with real-world smart card data. The findings reveal significant differences in criteria weighting between Indonesian and non-Indonesian experts, and between academic and non-academic experts, especially in transit connectivity and land use diversity. The study also shows variations in station rankings across different MCDM methods. Sensitivity analysis identifies transit connectivity as the most critical criterion. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) with linear normalisation aligns well with actual usage data and shows robustness in sensitivity analysis, making it the most reliable method for TOD evaluation. The study highlights the need for continuous TOD performance monitoring and the regular collection of real-world data on ridership and TOD indicators.